http://occupycorporatism.com/obamas-science-adviser-says-chemtrails-will-save-the-planet/

He didn’t have anything to say about population reduction in this statement.

Susan Yoshihara wrote in 2008 that falling birthrates in Western nations are posing a “security threat.” According to a study by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, the world now faces a “low fertility trap” as populations decline in Western nations.

The Times Online reported in 2005 that Russia has more abortions per year than live births. Russia’s population is declining at a rate of 1 million people per year. In 50 years, Russia’s population is projected to be cut in half from present levels. Feminism in Russia has resulted in large numbers of sterile women from botched abortions. The average Russian woman has 8 abortions in her lifetime. Abortion, cheap vodka, and the destruction of Christianity were Russia’s recipe for utopia. Instead, these policies led to Russia’s demise. The government now pays Russian women to have babies. Even so, Russia’s workforce is projected to become too low to support its economy in 2020.

In 2007 Canadian TV reported that Canada’s declining workforce poses problems for its economic future. CTV reports that many seniors will have to continue working during their retirement years as “professional couples” (feminist families) decided to have too few children to replace Canada’s population. Note in the Comments section that several people blamed government hiring practices for squeezing young people out of the workplace, while others saw the need for more government-sponsored childcare. The real story is, Canada is being targeted for large-scale immigration from Communist China by the New World Order leaders.

“Canada is running out of kids” continues the theme at Canada.com.

Jacqueline Kasun is the leading demographic expert who challenged the UN, Carter Administration, and environmentalist lies about population explosion. George Neumayr has a brief introduction to her work. Children aren’t the problem. Planned Parenthood is the problem.

If you still believe the lies of the population-bomb environmentalists such as Paul Ehrlich, have a look at the following graph (U.S. Census data, 2008):

The world is increasing in population, but the rate of growth is dramatically slowing. Meanwhile, Russia, Europe, Canada, and the United States are facing problems from population decline. Japan, the first nation targeted for population control by the Rockefellers after World War II, is facing drastic population decline. Time to wake up from your false environmentalist New World Order nightmare. The world population isn’t going to double in 50 years, or 100 years. There is plenty of arable land, and no shortage of space on planet earth for people to live in. The environmentalists and feminists have been lying to you.

“In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day.” Jacques Cousteau

Obama is still a very dangerous person, even as he puts on the front of compromise in order to get reelected. Obama has two very dangerous science advisers, science czar John Holdren and global warming alarmist James Hansen. Hansen has endorsed a recent book, Time’s Up, that advocates eco-terrorism. These are the guys who want to blow up the dams and bomb the cities to rubble because man is a blot on the environment.

Holdren wrote a book in which he called for a global government to enforce abortions and sterilizations to cull the human population.

Holdren interview. How can we stop these dangerous nuts?

No need for charts or graphs. Putting out junk science hasn’t really worked that well. People object to being lied to.

Let’s put the White House in charge of research. Great idea. Gay Marxist Obama never lies to us or picks our pocket.

The environmentalist position is that civilization must be destroyed to save the planet. They forgot to add the final three words of the sentence, “for the elite.”

The Left has always hated civilization and humanity. We can’t quite explain why because we are not a psychopathological pervert. You’ll have to ask them.

Geoengineering is being discussed at the highest levels.

There’s no limit on how nutty these guys get.

And they have friends in low places. A favorable review of Time’s Up at World News Trust. More enviro lies here. If you ever wondered where the crazy people get their bad ideas from, check out World News Trust.

Of course the Left is organizing for terrorism, that’s what they do best. You did notice all those socialists rioting in Europe, didn’t you? Of course the enviros are going to use geoengineering and eco-terrorism if the good people block them.

How “great ideas” evolve. First, put morons in charge:

How to get attention without having to engage in any intellectual effort. But these guys are just useful tools. At the higher levels, watch out, they are dangerous, you are the target, and they intend to kill you.

How they fool the gullible: First you have to be a socialist. Then, of course, you want to believe. Falling downhill is easy.

Let’s catch up with their latest ideas, post-Cancun.

“Snowfalls are a thing of the past.” What the Warmal Cooling crowd is saying after the coldest winter in history.

“2010 will be one of the warmest years on record.”

Global warming scaremongering at Cancun. Why they’re not giving up after Climategate: There’s too much money to be made from your funding. What they really want: money and control.

You’re in favor of another international treaty, aren’t you?

Funny how the journalists never report on what really goes on behind the scenes at international conferences.Bribery, mostly. Just like the Democrats in Congress.

Cancun treaty includes food rationing, forced relocation:

Did we mention how the elites have set themselves up to make billions on the scam?

Their standing proposal: Socialism, high taxes, global one-child policy, abortion, sterilization, carbon rationing, carbon taxes, wealth transfer from the U.S. to global institutions. You know the Democrats would do all this if they could only get away with it. They haven’t given up trying.

More Green taxes are always good, according to the Left. They are hoping that they can drive the price of oil high enough to make some alternative energy idea look rational.

Obama’s Energy Department and EPA are in direct cahoots with the global socialist takeover agenda.

Who is funding the geoengineering plans.

Dismantling the Green Congress.

The Carbon Sense Coalition debunks the CO2 warming theory.

Another look at the academy of sciences.

Why you don’t want to trust Obama’s czars. It’s really just a criminal mafia.

Where the stimulus money went: to bribe Mexican Marxists to support the green death plan. That was easy.

USCAP decides to take a long winter’s nap. Trust me, these liars aren’t going away, they have to be prosecuted and put away.

The celebrity billionaires behind world population reduction.

Sometimes just a little debate is like holding up a mirror, and the geoengineer realizes how ridiculous she sounds.Guess it depends on who you hang out with.

By the way, you can forget about those UN 7-9 billion population projections. They ignore fertility rates, which are dropping extremely fast. Within the next generation, the world population increase will decline drastically into world population decrease.

Of interest:

The feminist ideal: Industrial motherhood and reproductive prostitution.

Japan’s population shrinks in 2010.

An easy read on the big picture at No Ma’am. You might begin to grasp that it’s a conspiracy.

Why we’re so worried:

The enviros need to warm up the climate to make their global warming lie into a reality to continue with their looting and depopulation agenda. Obama is committed to governing through federal agencies and presidential directives now that Congress can block him. The Left never stops the takeover even when defeated. The shrill, desperate tone from the enviro clones indicates they are back on their heels and looking for something to save them from irrelevance. They have the technology. In the next post we’ll explain how they do it.

Once you understand their totalitarian master plan, there is no reason to engage in debating about or even thinking about whether the Left intends to “restore the economy,” “create or save” jobs, “get the economy moving again,” or do anything for the American people. It is an anti-human total takeover agenda. The plans are on paper and out in the open. The Left is going to continue to cooperate with Communist regimes and global socialist schemes, period. It’s a power grab, pure and simple, and a criminal enterprise.

Yep, all that talk on TV about “helping people” etc. is just hot air. Now you don’t have to waste your time with them, you know who the enemy is.

Finally, psychologists profile the “green personality type” and conclude they are unreliable, anti-social people. We already knew that. People who go green are the useful idiots of global socialism. There is plenty of information out there about the evils of environmentalism, you don’t have to be a genius to find it. The greens have no excuse. They are fanatics and dupes, avoid them, and boycott every green scheme.

The worst thing that can happen to us has already happened, being taken over by socialism.

This planet is old and scarred and cracked and is part of a larger solar system, hence responds to powerful physical forces. This has nothing to do with man’s activities.

There’s more to it than that. The environmental agenda is the evil New World Order takeover agenda.

Now let’s profile the psychologists and expose them for unreliable, anti-social people they really are. Oh, we already did that. Never mind.

While we’re at it, here’s remedial viewing on the global warming scam:

More crackpot ideas from the enviro “scientists.” Can geoengineering nerd become another Leftie career path? Sure, as long as our tax dollars keep funding them.

The Left’s strategy: Let’s pretend there’s some problem. Then they can take us over, rob us and control us. Oldest trick in the leftie playbook.

Junk science is the front for their agenda. Now you know to be skeptical of science, the Left has ruined it. Don’t get fooled again.

The Haig-Kissinger depopulation policy

by Lonnie Wolfe

Special Report EIR (Executive Intelligence Review)

Published at http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/nwopopcnsaglobal2000report10mar81.shtml and

http://home.iae.nl/users/lightnet/world/depopulation.htm

March 10, 1981

Investigations by EIR have uncovered a planning apparatus operating outside the control of the White House whose sole purpose is to reduce the world’s population by 2 billion people through war, famine, disease and any other means necessary. This apparatus, which includes various levels of the government is determining U.S. foreign policy. In every political hotspot — El Salvador, the so-called arc of crisis in the Persian Gulf, Latin America, Southeast Asia and in Africa — the goal of U.S. foreign policy is population reduction. The targeting agency for the operation is the National Security Council’s Ad Hoc Group on Population Policy. Its policy-planning group is in the U.S. State Department’s Office of Population Affairs, established in 1975 by Henry Kissinger. This group drafted the Carter administration’s Global 2000 document, which calls for global population reduction, and the same apparatus is conducting the civil war in El Salvador as a conscious depopulation project.

“There is a single theme behind all our work — we must reduce population levels,” said Thomas Ferguson, the Latin American case officer for the State Department’s Office of Population Affairs (OPA). “Either they [governments] do it our way, through nice clean methods or they will get the kind of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran, or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it.”

“The professionals,” said Ferguson, “aren’t interested in lowering population for humanitarian reasons. That sounds nice. We look at resources and environmental constraints. We look at our strategic needs, and we say that this country must lower its population or else we will have trouble.”

“So steps are taken. El Salvador is an example where our failure to lower population by simple means has created the basis for a national security crisis. The government of El Salvador failed to use our programs to lower their population. Now they get a civil war because of it…. There will be dislocation and food shortages. They still have too many people there.”

Civil wars are somewhat drawn-out ways to reduce population, the OPA official added. “The quickest way to reduce population is through famine, like in Africa or through disease like the Black Death,” all of which might occur in El Salvador. Ferguson’s OPA monitors populations in the Third World and maps strategies to reduce them. Its budget for FY 1980 was $190 million; for FY 198l, it will be $220 million. The Global 2000 report calls for doubling that figure. The sphere of Kissinger In 1975, OPA was brought under a reorganized State Department Bureau of Oceans, International Environmental, and Scientific Affairs — a body created by Henry Kissinger.

The agency was assigned to carry out the directives of the NSC Ad Hoc Group. According to an NSC spokesman, Kissinger initiated both groups after discussion with leaders of the Club of Rome during the 1974 population conferences in Bucharest and Rome. The Club of Rome, controlled by Europe’s black nobility, is the primary promotion agency for the genocidal reduction of world population levels. The Ad Hoc Group was given “high priority” by the Carter administration, through the intervention of National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski and Secretaries of State Cyrus Vance and Edmund Muskie.

According to OPA expert Ferguson, Kissinger initiated a full about-face on U.S. development policy toward the Third World. “For a long time,” Ferguson stated, “people here were timid. They listened to arguments from Third World leaders that said that the best contraceptive was economic reform and development. So we pushed development programs, and we helped create a population time bomb. We are letting people breed like flies without allowing for natural causes to keep population down. We raised the birth survival rates, extended life-spans by lowering death rates, and did nothing about lowering birth rates.”

“That policy is finished. We are saying with Global 2000 and in real policy that you must lower population rates. Population reduction and control is now our primary policy objective — then you can have some development.” Accordingly, the Bureau of Oceans, International Environmental, and Scientific Affairs has consistently blocked industrialization policies in the Third World, denying developing nations access to nuclear energy technology–the policies that would enable countries to sustain a growing population. According to State Department sources, and Ferguson himself, Alexander Haig is a “firm believer” in population control.

“We will go into a country,” said Ferguson, “and say, here is your goddamn development plan. Throw it out the window. Start looking at the size of your population and figure out what must be done to reduce it.”

“If you don’t like that, if you don’t want to choose to do it through planning, then you’ll have an El Salvador or an Iran, or worse, a Cambodia.” According to an NSC spokesman, the United States now shares the view of former World Bank President Robert McNamara that the “population crisis” is a greater threat to U.S. national security interests than “nuclear annihilation.” “Every hot spot in the world corresponds to a population crisis point,” said Ferguson who would rename Brzezinski’s arc of crisis doctrine the “arc of population crisis.”

This is corroborated by statements in the NSC Ad Hoc Group’s April 1980 report. There is “an increased potential for social unrest, economic and political instability, mass migration and possible international conflicts over control of land and resources,” says the NSC report. It then cites “demographic pressures” as key to understanding “examples of recent warfare in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, El Salvador, Honduras, and Ethiopia, and the growing potential for instability in such places as Turkey, the Philippines, Central America, Iran, and Pakistan.” Through extraordinary efforts, the Ad Hoc Group and OPA estimate that they may be able to keep a billion people from being born through contraceptive programs.

But as the Ad Hoc Group’s report states, the best efforts of the Shah of Iran to institute “clean programs” of birth control failed to make a significant dent in the country’s birth rate. The promise of jobs, through an ambitious industrialization program, encouraged migration toward “overcrowded cities” like Teheran. Now under Ayatollah Khomeini, the “clean programs” have been dismantled. The government may make progress because it has a program “to induce up to half of Teheran’s 6 million residents to relocate, as well as possible measures to keep rural migrants from moving to the cities.” Behind the back of the President, Ferguson and others involved with the OPA and NSC group maintain that the United States will continue a foreign policy based on a genocidal reduction of the world’s population.

“We have a network in place of cothinkers in the government,” said the OPA case officer. “We keep going, no matter who is in the White House.” But Ferguson reports that the “White House” does not really understand what they are saying and that the President “thinks that population policy means how do we speed up population increase.”

“As long as no one says differently,” said Ferguson, “we will continue to do our jobs.”

Of interest

We’ve never admired Stewart Brand or any other environmentalist dupe, but it is somewhat noteworthy when an old lefty comes to his senses and figures out that population reduction is the real threat. Note that Brand still believes in global warming, so he’s still a dupe for doctored data.

Why global warming is a fraud. Delingpole reports.

Wind farms are expensive eyesores that don’t deliver energy.

If global governance is so great, why did they throw Gordon Brown out of office?

Why Rachel Carson wrote Silent Spring, the result was African genocide.

Driessen on the eco-imperialists’ African genocide. The environmentalists are anti-human criminals.

Why alarmism over the environment never turns out to be true. The natural habitat of the environmentalist is the land of theory in the air-conditioned office, with the rent paid by socialism.

What does the Left really mean by “sustainable”?

Why feminism is the most dangerous movement in the world.

Beware of the U.S. military/UN/environmental axis of death.

But NWOU is just a small voice in the wilderness. The right idea is to make a video about the problem. People like videos. Easier than reading.

Demographic Winter, the DVD website.

A review of the documentary at Human Events.

A second documentary. The Demographic Bomb website.

A review at LifeSiteNews.

Money magazine catches up. Why population growth correlates with economic prosperity, not poverty.

Europe tries to organize against the deadly anti-white policies of EU socialism threatening bankruptcy.

The Left’s response:

Name-calling, of course. They can’t dispute the statistics so they slander the messenger. Actually, all of the demographic experts in the documentary are lefties expressing “surprise” at the trendlines. Liberals are always surprised that reality doesn’t match their propaganda lies. They really should be congratulating themselves on the success of their forced-sterilization policies.

Discovering the pro-family agenda.

Right-wing groups promoting “fear.” Not that the population-reducing enviro-liars ever did that. Weren’t we supposed to hand over power to them because of “global warming”?

Ronald Bailey argues that demographic decline is voluntary because people don’t like children. He seems to have overlooked the purposeful world depopulation agenda of the feminists and environmentalists, and their massive funding. Funny how the Left can overlook the success of their own planned agenda.

Nothing to worry about, it’s just a “brain freeze.” See, it’s simple. Just invent a slogan. That’s what the Left does best.

Feder responds to the Nation.

Stephen Mosher responds. Nice article.

Jennifer Morse notes there was nothing about race in Demographic Winter.

Despite all the name-calling, the documentary brought the statistics out into public view, and the Left can no longer deny them without calling the major demographic experts liars.

Of interest:

The myth of progress in Singapore. It’s unsustainable. Demographic winter.

China’s Demographic Winter. China wants to abandon it’s one-child policy. Guess they didn’t ask the U.S. Left what they thought.

The Left’s solution in the Philippines: prepare boys to be housewives.

Croatia, a case study in demographic decline. If you need details about why socialism doesn’t work.

Black population of Britain grows by 40 percent.

60 percent of Brits fear race violence. Thanks to the Left.

Over 50 percent of babies born in Paris are black. But Sarkozy doesn’t care, he wants to eliminate the white race.

Bottom line: The population control policies of the Left have been disastrous around the world, now they are smearing the exposers. Nothing new about that. But the facts are out in the open now, and even people who can’t read can watch a video documenting the coming Demographic Winter.

Marvin Harris became one of the most influential populizers of anthropology on the basis of his historical analysis in Cultural Materialism and Cannibals and Kings. Harris theorizes about the formation of the strong state systems that dominate history. He believes that agriculture arose from the depletion of large animals in various ecological environments and that animal domestication and agriculture arose together as innovative solutions to the problem of declining big-game herds. These two innovations gave the competitive edge to settled populations over bands of hunters and forced the hunters to domesticate. In the large river valley systems, rising populations then began to exceed the capacity for herd animals to supply protein to everyone. This led to a variety of cultural adaptations, including vegetarianism (for the lower castes) in India and cannibalism in Aztec Mexico.

Harris’ analysis is based on the relationships between animal food supply in ecosystems and more or less constant rising population pressure as the main dynamics driving cultural innovation and adaptation. Harris credits these twin “pressures” with forcing human inventiveness and technological innovation.

Harris devotes a lot of discussion to primitive methods of fertility control, including geronticide, infanticide, delaying pregnancy through extended lactation, delaying menarche, infanticide from neglect, as well as more familiar abortion and birth control measures. Harris believes these practices were needed due to the sheer productivity of human reproduction, everywhere and always. We found this discussion to be most interesting as we had not given attention previously to the shadowy history of female-centered fertility control.

Harris interprets religion mainly in terms of animal protein control (priesthoods gaining control over animal sacrifices and sanctioning human sacrifices), thus serving as rational allocators of resources in the constant battle between human reproductive capacity and the food limits of particular environments.

However one approaches ancient history, Harris is a provocative author as he deals frankly with the unpleasant realities of early humans engaged in the struggle for food and fertility control. We also like Harris’ characterization of large civilizations as essentially organized for the pleasure of the powerful elites while the masses of humanity served as slaves or serfs with long workdays and very few rewards. Harris contrasts the long workday schedules of man under civilization with the leisure options of men in hunter bands and makes a case that life as a hunter was much preferable to life under Caesar or pharaoh or the Chinese emperors, even with civilization’s advances in technology. Harris believes the exploitation of the worker continued under industrialism, so modern technological innovation and state-centered socialism have not solved the problem of modern resource scarcity versus ancient resource abundance that our first ancestors enjoyed. This observation may have been somewhat true in nineteenth-century Europe and in Communist developing economies, but Harris’ model breaks down under modern economics.

Harris also has a brief introductory discussion of the hydrology theories of Karl Wittfogel, and he observes that Wittfogel rebutted Marxism, which Harris recognizes as just another form of state-dominated slavery. However, Harris’ cultural determinism belongs to the line Malthus-Darwin-Marx, the attempt to make a science of history. Harris has not liberated himself from the errors of scientific determinism, he remains firmly in this camp. As we pointed out in The Hidden Masters, all attempts to make a science of history have resulted in pseudo-science.

It’s funny that the main error of the anthropologists is not walking across the hall to have a conversation with the historians. Historians rejected scientific history as false decades ago. That scientific determinism can remain as a basis for anthropology is a measure of how corrupt the universities are.

Harris wrote recently, during the reign of Cultural Marxism over the universities. But Neo-marxism is a confused mess, now contaminated with Freudism, occultism, feminism, parallel universism, global warming and other junk sciences, dope smokism, nasty global socialist overspendism into unmanageable debtism, deep eco death goddess worship, economic ignorantism, Zizekism, Lacanism, multiculturalism, Hollywood distort historyism, Obamaism, child abuse gayism, and what’s in it for meism. We’ve sorted our way through this mess in previous posts. There’s nothing of value in it.

But before we get to the really stupid ideas Harris promotes, let’s have a look at his main ideas about cultural evolution driven by resource shortages. We find this material compelling, and we want to do justice to his theories. We hope we are reading Harris correctly in our interpretation. We read Harris to say that priestly elites in the major civilizations were sharp observers of ecological deterioration, declines in food supply, and population increases, to the point of being able to direct agricultural practices and to direct women about fertility control to maintain population balance. This characterization of the priestly caste as both sharp observers and civilization-wide controllers conflicts with our more conventional belief that the state monitored food supply and the women monitored and controlled fertility on a decentralized basis. In other words, we don’t buy Harris’ characterization of religious elites as being everywhere sharp mediators between fertility and food supply.

If hunting and gathering were such a superior lifestyle, why wouldn’t there be a widespread turn away from agriculture and animal domestication back to hunting when conditions favored it? Because agriculture and animal domestication offer higher standards of living and greater economic security. Harris’ doesn’t believe agriculture and animal domestication offered these advantages. Instead he characterizes their invention as short-term solutions to the enduring problem of resource shortages.

Harris omits any discussion of natural disasters upsetting social arrangements. His “natural history” is a smooth theoretical continuum. Harris is speaking at a very general level and is subject to overgeneralization of a few key ideas. The men of theory usually fall into the same errors.

The demographic statistics he cites often do not support his theory. Harris acknowledges that human populations remained stable for many hundreds of years in many state systems, but he does a poor job of explaining why. Harris’ scope is so large and extends so far back in time that we doubt he has control of his subject.

If population pressure versus food resources was the main dynamic of civilized human history and the priesthood everywhere were allocating resources and controlling fertility, why didn’t ancient writers and state propagandists bring the problem into high focus in their texts?

Even though Harris salutes Wittfogel and downplays Marx, he does not abandon economic determinism leading to cultural determinism. His economic determinism relies on natural determinism, based on the central concepts of evolutionary theorizing, including the central arbitrating role of that supremely powerful force that doesn’t even exist, natural selection. Harris adopts the popular Marxist idea of culture as a “superstructure” resting upon an economic base. Not all Marxists are evolutionists, but Harris is a world population controller, and these controllers cannot resist the argument by analogy from evolution. Evolutionary theorizers fall into one of the most important fallacies in deterministic theorizing, the belief that human populations act as animal populations do. Naturalistic determinism is sometimes called “The Romantic fallacy” because this way of thinking arose during the nineteenth century when Romanticism ruled thinking about history.

Let’s focus on the aspects of Harris’ theory that most appeal to the world population controllers and the enviro-sadists. Harris believes that, before the modern era, the introduction of new technologies always led to population increase, whether it be the transition from stone to metal tools, rainfall to irrigation, or animal power to steam, coal, and oil power. Demographers call this “the demographic transition.” The key question for Harris, and the population controllers, is why Malthus was wrong, why population did not skyrocket in the nineteenth century as Malthus predicted. Harris’ answer is, greater fuel efficiency, improved contraception, and the shift in occupation from the family business and farm to the salaried job. This shift made children into economic liabilities rather than economic assets. Harris believes children today are only of economic value if they help their parents with the medical crises involved with aging, and this value will cease as governments insure aging populations with welfare and medical programs.

You can see here the inability of the anthropologist to theorize about human value as his conceptualization scheme relies on powerful forces determining human behavior. Materialists can only offer materialistic interpretations of human actions. They are entirely removed from the realm of human values. In such theories, the forces of nature must be supremely powerful and forcefully conditioning, otherwise materialistic determinism loses its underlying rationale. Harris’ clever contribution to this line of sterile thinking is, he puts all human creativity under the determination of two supremely powerful forces. The term for this fallacy is, reductionism.

Reductionism means, the collapse of categories of complexity into an oversimplified scheme. The oversimplification is always accompanied by the unwarranted belief that the theorist understands what is causing.

But Harris ignores too many positive developments under modern industrialization that really make modernism a watershed period in history. The modern agricultural revolution improved productivity dramatically through the mechanization of agriculture, development of pesticides and fertilizer, medical control of contagious diseases, scientific ag schools and ag extension services, introduction of new species to farm economies around the world, international shipping, land reclamation projects, etc. There isn’t a word in Harris about the green revolution in agriculture, the ability of breadbaskets to produce astounding surpluses using far less labor under mechanization. That is a pretty big topic to ignore if you want to theorize about resource shortages leading to fertility declines. All of the world population controllers consistently ignore or underestimate the productivity of the supply side.

Harris is so used to theorizing in terms of a few basic concepts (natural selection, technological innovation under pressure, the necessity for cultural adaptation to rising and falling populations and food supplies) that he continues to rely on them for the modern era. But technological innovation in the modern era is not driven by resource scarcity, it is institutionalized as a kind of science of invention that is required by market competition and the guiding worldview of progress.

The modern era is truly different, even if you want to characterize previous human history as “natural determinism” leading to cultural adaptation. Today, institutionalized and systematic technological innovation trump natural resource limits. This development more or less coincides with the rise of European secret societies as power centers competing to take over the world. Nature’s food supply limits ceased to be the main factor in human development in Europe a few hundred years ago, even if you choose to believe, with Harris, that it once was.

For example, Harris is in error in believing that the sexual revolution was a response to economic or population factors. It was a propaganda campaign of feminism. World population control proceeded from the eugenic basis, not from any understanding of the relationships of economic development to population growth, poverty, living standards, or even population statistics. In a word, Harris ignores New World Order history. In fact, he falls for every propaganda construction of late modernism that fronts for the New World Order, including peak oil, phony climate science, one-world environmentalism, and the deliberately false predictions of catastrophe offered by Green Marxists such as Ehrlich and Hardin.

Harris is also in error in claiming that future standards of living depend on transitions to “alternative energies.” Alternative energies are inefficient and insufficient to fuel the present level of economic function. Wind, solar, and biomass have already shown their failure. Biomass consumes too much food supply, wind requires too much land to efficiently replace power plants, and solar can’t be used to fuel autos and industrial plants. The hope is that alternative energies may someday constitute 3 percent of total world energy usage. This isn’t enough to make the field interesting. But every Green fool blabbers on about alternative energy sources and green jobs because they are caught up in the propaganda and don’t look into who creates the propaganda. Harris similarly seems entirely uninformed about the New World Order agenda.

Marxists appear deliberately naïve, or outright liars, when they rely only on Marx’s writings and ignore his role as an active revolutionary as head of the Committee of Just Men and the various iterations of the Communist International. The Neo-marxists act as if the revolution were about to happen. It already happened, and it didn’t work.

Harris also claims that nuclear power leads to the police state, and democracy depends on decentralized energy sources. These statements are so stupid we’ll just dismiss them without rebuttal. Napoleon invented the modern version of the police state, imitating Weishaupt’s methods of control, and every government since Napoleon has copied it. Nuclear power has nothing to do with it.

Harris claims that the energy-intensive nature of agriculture (the energy ratio) leads to exhaustion of the oil supply. But, bad news Mr. Harris, so much new oil has been discovered in the past ten years that the peak oil theory has crashed. There is so much oil and natural gas just inside the United States that the enviros are scrambling to lock it in the ground so that it can’t be used. Agriculture can get even more energy-intensive, at low cost, if the socialists would just allow it.

Let’s briefly summarize the main anthropological error as the error of Marxism, or, if you want a fallback position, the error of secular thinking. Anthropologists buy into economic determinism hook, line, and sinker. As they approach their studies armed with their conclusions in advance, what are they going to find? Economic determinism. All secular thinkers fall into the error of believing that the secular society is a form of progress, or that their ideas for social engineering are beneficial interventions in “evolutionary processes.” Anthropologists can’t just study primitive societies and let it go at that. No, they have to set themselves up as the knowledgeable arbiters of future human evolution. Their simple framework of thinking is, human history in the past suffered from determinative factors such as production and reproduction, which determined culture. The dynamic that was faulty in previous human decision making was setting short-term solutions and then building upon them for the long term. Somehow the Left believes that they are doing something different. They are so arrogant that they believe human history is the history of human unconsciousness, and their agenda will bring man out of an unconscious and determined life into a conscious, planned future.

Wow. If you can fall for that one, immediately enroll in anthropology. You are dumb enough to be an anthropologist.

Are anthropologists so dumb that they cannot recognize that the agenda of social engineering is a planned program of evil domination by global elites? Are they really unaware that every prediction of the Left about modern economics has been false? No cities choked by pollution leading to mass deaths, no oil exhaustion, no mass starvations except in Communist countries. Can’t they recognize that every serious resource shortage must be marked by extremely high prices and then higher prices as the resource disappears?

Is it really the fundamental error of the anthropologists that they didn’t study economics and the history of secret societies? Is that all there is to it?

Not exactly. There is also the agenda of falsifying data. Margaret Mead, for example, purposely falsified her data on Samoa, and the lackeys in anthropology let her get away with it. Today anthropology’s problem is, how is any professor concerned with methodology going to correct the observations of 20-year-old feminists sent into “the field” armed with false feminist history? They don’t, as the bookshelves full of false feminist theories shows. Anthropology does not do a good job of disciplining its discipline.

You also have to notice that anthropology today is taking weird forms. Theories are shifting to align with postmodernism, media studies, art theories, communication theories, and the peculiarities of gender studies. Anthropology is fad-driven, and always has been. Today these fads are under the control of the Neo-marxist cesspool of bad ideas. The same is true of psychology and other social sciences. The field of social psychology is almost entirely driven by the need to hide the origins of the New World Order conspiracy by discrediting conspiracy “theory.” It’s really amusing to read social psychologists under the dominant paradigm of naturalistic determinism explain that social panics arise in periodic “waves.”

Science requires that everything be a system, which is why it cannot deal with the individual, the particular, the unique. Social science makes of reality a system. This is its violence. Eventually such theorizing removes actors and actions, removes all qualities, and turns them into quantities and deterministic laws. The whole enterprise is a load of rubbish. Anthropological theorizing at the level of history is so lame that it begins to override all of the carefully observed local studies.

Lest you believe that this is all a harmless lark, an empty intellectual enterprise, we’ll explain in a future post how anthropologists have been recruited by the U.S. government as authorities and control experts to radically remake U.S. civil society.

Our dilemma under corrupt socialism is that we must search for pure sources from a less corrupted time, not merely to affirm the life principle and human values which science could not locate in materialism but also to link ourselves with the greatness of man’s history. Anthropology may have a certain appeal for naïve Stalinists who believe that mankind has been unconscious and materially determined whereas they are free, conscious, in possession of superior knowledge, and able to act to further the liberation of the masses to avert the errors of the past, but we see them clearly. We see them adopting every quality of false liberal consciousness and ignorant of the people who are really controlling the world. And that is your how-to-avoid anthropology lesson for today. Actually they are the biggest Marxist dupes and the worst overgeneralizers. But keep those government subsidies coming, because nothing could be sweeter than making up theories on our dime.

Human history is full of human confrontations that changed history. Buddha debated all the siddhis in the deer forest and converted them once and for all with the power of his argument.

Anthropology needs such a housecleaning, a public debate of theorizers who will put to rest the refuted theories. But anthropology doesn’t work in the open. It sponsors endless new theorizing while keeping the debate controlled to a few journals and elite forums. It doesn’t want fresh air. That way all the discarded and rebutted theories can remain in the fertilizer pile, ready for recycling at the next turn of the fashion parade. If all of you understood how many of the icons of anthropology have been proven wrong and were outright frauds, there would be no more naïve dupes to pull into their programs.

Anthropology is a politics of natural determinism, not a science. The study of ancient man is fascinating, but be careful who you do it with. Wordsworth observed at the beginning of the nineteenth century,

“the philosophy of mechanism in which everything that is most worthy of the human intellect strikes death.”

By reducing man to the state of an animal and convincing you that he is entirely shaped by “nature’s forces,” anthropology creates a false reductionist materialism that might even convince you that black is white and human population needs a world body to control it.

Theory is the pitfall of the intellectual. Seduced by theory, he will neglect to cultivate sympathy, humility, and the good. That is why the career path for anthropologists is into United Nations NGOs and foundations devoted to controlling other people’s families and siphoning off economic productivity into socialist control bureaucracies.

The only people who are capable of being so fooled are those who really really hate capitalism to the point of never studying its productive capability.

Of interest:

Biography and overview

Review of Marvin Harris, Cultural Materialism

From Cultural Materialism

Harris bibliography

Buying cultural determinism hook, line, and sinker.

Another favorable review arguing against “culture as accident.”

Of high interest:

Stone age primitivism as green agenda.

The Greens also work off of anthropological theorizing, and not just for the purpose of controlling other people’s family size. The Marxist Green agenda relies on the idea of “resource shortages” to justify its global socialist takeover. The Greens can pose as “saviors” from “capitalist waste” and consumer life-styles and as “preservers” of “environment” if they can get you to believe that fertility rates will overwhelm “resource limits.”

But we have exposed these frauds in previous posts. We are calling your attention to Zerzan today because he has one good point in his return to the stone age agenda. The question of importance Zerzan and Harris call attention to is, how much technology do you really want in your new society?

Our short answer is, more than Zerzan, but technology needs to be tightly controlled or the elites will exploit the masses. You will need to set up an institution to check the introduction of new technologies and set up test conditions before allowing widespread adoption of technology. You cannot have mass markets open to all producers or the techno innovators will build the global police state at the mass level. These are key questions to consider: do you want radio, TV, internet in your society? Why? Could these media be reformed and become useful, or are they entirely worthless, corrupting, vulgar, perverted?

Abolishing the relationship, “socialism funds science” is necessary to prevent the abuses of institutionalized science. We have covered the history of scientific fraud in The Hidden Masters. Most scientific research today is absurd and useless. The research agenda is controlled from the top of the pyramid, through funding. Big science serves the NWO takeover. Science has no human value and serves the controllers. The corrective to science run amok spreading pseudosciences like viruses is, every scientist must have a human-oriented controller.

If you don’t control science in your new society, you will end up with nuclear weapons, biological weapons, mind control weapons, weaponized vaccines, the whole disaster science has created for us.

Anthropologists study you to control you. There is a close parallel between anthropology and marketing research. It is the height of absurdity to volunteer personal information to marketing research companies, they only use it to learn how to sell you. Similarly, the correct response to meeting an anthropologists is, bash his brains out with a rock, cook him, and eat him. You must not allow a liberal near your tribe, or it is just a matter of time until they destroy your society.

Are anthropologists good for anything? Just one: they are a source of protein. Thank-you, Marvin Harris, for pointing that out. Otherwise, we can’t give you credit for any intellectual contribution because, you know, all culture is just a determined response to resource pressure. The main intellectual contribution of Harris and other cultural determinists is to make the great history of human creativity boring.

People who study other people are evil, even if they are simply naive dupes when they undertake their studies. Social scientists will not be allowed in White Village unless we are experiencing famine.

“I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. There are others, which, one must suppose, opponents of birth control would prefer. War, as I remarked a moment ago, has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective. If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full. There would be nothing in this to offend the consciences of the devout or to restrain the ambitions of nationalists. The state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of that? Really high-minded people are indifferent to happiness, especially other people’s.” Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1953), pp.103-104.

Really high-minded people are not indifferent to other people’s happiness. New World Order jerks are. As we documented in The Hidden Masters, Russell was a practicing Satanist.

The UNFPA became the central population control agency, but
immediately it was criticized for bypassing national governments and
being unaccountable to UN member states. UNFPA was criticized as a
“U.S. front organization.” UNFPA had no assessment personnel. Awash
with funds from Rockefeller, Sweden, and the U.S., UNFPA decided it
needed to launder its sources of funds by enlisting the World Bank as
stand-in financier. Moreover, many countries were actually
underpopulated and were experiencing declining fertility rates
without population control programs. Some of these countries united
to oppose fertility control in their countries.

By 1971 much of this new money was pouring into India. India was
paying one hundred rupees per sterilization and was achieving 60,000
sterilizations per month in some provinces. Large clinics were
performing as many as fifty vasectomies at a time. In Gujarat
230,000 sterilizations were performed in two months. Officials in
Gujarat were paid 1000 rupees as a reward, which exceed the average
annual income in India. The Ministry of Health established a goal of
5.6 million sterilizations per year.

As the U.S. fought its war against poverty, the language was also
applied to the war against population. Contraception was
“ammunition”, the officials were “troops,” and the people were “the
enemy.” However, the main weapon, the IUD, had a 40% failure rate,
and indiscriminate sterilization of older people made the programs
less effective than they may have appeared.

The new global population strategy also suffered from lack of
statistics as many nations would not reveal their statistics to
prevent criticism. Follow-up studies were rare and did not influence
the shaping of programs because so many now had a vested interest in
continuing the money flow. By 1974 the UN was disbursing $3 billion
annually for population control, roughly one-third of all
international aid.

By 1974 Africans had begun organized attacks on UN population control
programs, accusing the UN of Neomalthusiainsm and targeting the poor.

In 1974 the World Population Conference issued a World Population
Plan of Action. Part of this plan called for building 1500 buildings
and hiring 30,000 population workers in Indonesia. Villagers were
required to attend regular public meetings and report on their
contraception use. In Bangladesh several tens of thousands of
population workers were hired to institute a massive fertility
control program. These programs were really financed by USAID through
grants to the UN.

By 1980, international sterilization programs were being funded with
$35 million worldwide. Thousands of foreign doctors were trained in
sterilization procedures at Johns Hopkins University and then sent
home. A trained doctor could now perform 90 sterilizations per day.
The controllers also stepped up their promotion of abortion by
issuing “menstrual regulation” kits. The idea was to flood nations
with cheap technology that would bypass any legal restrictions on
abortion.

But by 1973 the brain trust, Rockefeller, Robert McNamara, Ford
Foundation Vice President David Bell, and David Hopper of the
International Development Research Center, had no definitive research
showing cause and effect on fertility programs and thus no basis for
advising governments on how to control population. Meanwhile, over
900 international projects were in operation.

In 1973 the Indian sterilization rate fell by 70 percent. UNFPA
granted India $40 million, and India increased the fee paid for
sterilization from 45 rupees to 70 rupees. The sterilization rate
then climbed back up to 1.4 million in 1974.

In 1974 the World Population Conference in Bucharest brought over
1000 delegates from 133 countries and over 900 journalists together
to brainstorm on population planning. The leaders wanted to link
population control with economic development under free trade.
However, opposition arose to the placement of so many former colonial
officials in the UN population movement. This “Third World” revolt
against population control as a continuation of imperialism was to
short-circuit the controllers’ plans. The U.S. delegates believed
that world fertility must be forced down to replacement level by 2000
or there would be food riots and revolutions that would close foreign
markets to U.S. investment under the planned global free trade regime.

The headline speaker, Lester R. Brown of the Overseas Development
council, then alarmed the assembly by stating that the world had less
than one month’s supply of food reserves, and the U.S. might soon
decide which nations would starve. Feminists Germaine Greer, Betty
Friedan, and Margaret Mead then led a women’s revolt against male
leadership over the population control movement. An anti-Malthusian
ad hoc organization then publicized abuses in the sterilization
camps. Rockefeller then delivered his speech in which he claimed
previous errors and announced a feminist slant on further projects,
with population control to be tied to economic development worldwide.
National sovereignty made a comeback at this conference. The IPPF was
accused of being a front for U.S. global interventionism.

The main outcome of this failed agenda was to promote feminists as
leaders of the world population control movement.

Meanwhile back in India the Congress Party fell into squabbling
factions and Indira Gandhi was found guilty of violations of election
laws. Gandhi invoked emergency powers and began to arrest over
100,000 members of the political opposition. With the suspension of
the Constitution, more severe methods were open to the population
control bureaucrats. Parents who had three children and did not
accept sterilization were now jailed. Indian bureaucrats elevated a
“right to progress” as superceding individual rights. The new program
raised the age of marriage, increased women’s literacy, and raised
incentive payments for sterilization to 150 rupees for those with two
children and 100 for those with three.

Indira Gandhi’s son Sanjay led the movement to demolish entire
neighborhoods. When local residents appeared to beg for mercy,
they were told to produce a few hundred candidates for sterilization
or have their neighborhood demolished. Locals then organized
resistance in several neighborhoods, and security forces were called
in. Many people were shot in these riots. As slums were demolished
and people were driven from their homes, only those with
sterilization certificates were eligible for relocation to new
housing. In some cities, every male slum inhabitant was forcibly
sterilized.

The World Bank was so excited by these successes in India that they
proposed another $26 million in aid for India. Sterilization then
became a precondition for receiving irrigation water, electricity,
food rations, medical care, pay raises, promotions, and business
licenses. A sterilization credit market then arose, with people able
to buy and sell the right to reproduce. However, throughout India
young, single men were targeted for mandatory sterilization. Sweden
then came forward with another $17 million to fund these projects,
and Robert McNamara visited India and reported favorably on the
campaign. The Plan was to take this program worldwide. In one year,
India recorded over 8 million sterilizations and 6.2 million
vasectomies. The Swedish economist Goran Ohlin complained to the
World Bank that there were too many empty beds in Indian
sterilization camps. All of the top population insiders approved of
these mandatory measures.

When Indira Gandhi called an election, the opposition parties became
free to complain about abuses in family planning. Gandhi closed the
sterilization camps, but her campaign rallies drew small crowds as
women began to abandon support for her. The Congress Party faced its
first defeat in history, losing 141 out of 142 seats in the states
that had experienced the most repressive sterilization laws.

With Indira Gandhi’s defeat, the population controllers began to face
more serious and better organized opposition. The failed predictions
of global famine and the already falling fertility rates across the
globe made population control seem less urgent and less justified.
Funding did not immediately dry up, but staffers began to walk away
from jobs that involved planning other people’s families. The
Population Council was in disarray. Both the Rockefeller and Ford
foundations switched focus toward economic development. A Ford paper
in 1977 even asked if it was appropriate for Ford to challenge
traditional morals and values and impose its views on others.

Congress investigated the IPPF, but IPPF officials testified to
Congress that IPPF did not support incentive payments and that USAID
prohibited involuntary sterilization. It never made it to the offical
record that USAID had used intermediaries in India or that IPPF was
responsible for 80,000 sterilizations in India in 1976. These lies prevented the U.S. people from understanding what their government was doing.

Swedish journalists then reported that population control in India had
provoked riots, massacres, and unsafe medical procedures. A revolt
against free condoms developed in the Philippines. In Indonesia the
press argued that free condoms from the U.S. supported underage
prostitution and warned that continuing such aid programs would make
sex as important in Indonesia as in the U.S. In 1977 Pakistan family
planning was attacked as against the spirit of Islam. In Iran the
Ayatollah Khomeini attacked the shah’s family planning program, then
ended it when he took power.

In 1977 Reimert Ravenholt, head of USAID Office of Population, let
the cat out of the bag in an interview with the St. Louis Post-
Dispatch. Ravenholt said the United States had a plan to sterilize
one-quarter of the women in the world. The reason USAID promoted
draconian population control measures abroad was to stimulate foreign
economic development so that the nations of the world would not rebel
against the foreign investments of U.S. corporations. In other words,
population control was a prerequisite for free trade agreements.

After the steep declines in fertility in India, follow-up studies
showed that the sterilization programs affected less than 5 percent
of a country’s fertility rate. Across the world fertility was
declining, whether there were family planning programs or not.
Brazil’s population was declining significantly without any sort of
program.

In 1973 Mao adopted population control and provided free
contraceptives. In 1997 China invited the IPPF to visit. China had
mobil IUD and sterilization teams, incentives, and quotas set by
government offices. China at first had relied on Japanese advice,
then followed up on the Club of Rome’s The Limits of Growth, which
predicted famines and the exhaustion of worldwide oil reserves by
1992. A Chinese missile scientist named Jian Song learned about the
Club of Rome at a conference in Helsinki. He then returned to China
and ran future population projections at the missile ministry
computers. Song reported a projection of 4 billion by 2080 if
families continued to have 3 children (the fertility rate was 2.7 in
the 1970s). China’s leaders then formed a campaign to halt all
population growth by 2000 by adopting a one-child policy.

The Chinese invited the IPPF into China because it wanted more
computers to process census data and track local birth quotas.
Chinese were given individual birth permits, good for one year only.
Local street committees monitored women’s menstrual cycles and forced
women to have monthly gynecological exams. Women who had an abortion
received 14 days of paid vacation, and 40 days if the abortion were
performed during the second trimester of pregnancy, followed by
sterilization. Parents who had more than two children were taxed an
extra ten percent of their wages.

However, there was rural resistance to these policies, and cash was
not always available to pay incentives. China increased its coercive
measures with “shock campaigns” of forced abortions, sterilizations,
and IUD insertions. With these tactics China achieved 8 million
abortions and 7 million sterilizations in 1979.

The UNFPA supported China with a $50 million grant in 1980.

In 1983 Xinzhong Qian, a former major general of the People’s
Liberation Army, was given authority to conduct coercive crash
programs inserting IUDs. All parents with two or more children were
to be sterilized, and all unauthorized pregnancies were to be
aborted. In 1983 over 16 million women and 4 million men were
sterilized, and 14 million abortions were performed. At the same
time, South Korea announced a one-child policy. In Singapore, the
government offered poor women $5000 if they would be sterilized, and
university graduates were given tax breaks if the would have three or
more children. The United Nations Population Award was given to Qian,
along with a monetary prize.

Assembled UN representatives also applauded the announcement by Cambodian and Laotian Communists that they had “solved their population problem” by mass murder.

Meanwhile USAID hinged its aid to Africa on performance of population
control objectives. World Food Program aid was denied to anyone who
was not sterilized.

USAID cut off support for China in 1985. Both the IPPF and UNFPA
denied that they funded abortions or coercive family planning. In
fact UNFPA had trained 70,000 population control agents in China.

Since there was no public investigation of UNFPA or disclosure of its
policies and activities, a generation of coercive eugenicists at the
UN never had to acknowledge their roles in the Indian and Chinese
coercive policies. In the 1980s young feminists began to enter
population studies and took jobs in these bureaucracies without ever knowing their history.

The Clinton administration restored funding cuts to IPPF and UNFPA.
Vice-President Al Gore then linked population growth with environmental
concerns. Population control efforts continue to be well funded by the U.S. and the UN. They are now linked with the agenda of global socialist control over the world economy.

Connelly concludes that the Malthusians such as Bertrand Russell, Harry Laughlin, and Julian Huxley were one-world government advocates who hoped that a world government would control world
population. They got their programs, but the future of world population is now under the control of Hillary Clinton Communist feminism, without a single voice advocating men’s rights or men’s control over their families. It is no longer the geneticists or the Malthusians who control world population but the matriarchalists, the Communists who control international feminism.

Connelly rejects naming this elite effort a conspiracy, but he does
suggest that conspiratorial evidence may lie in unexplored archives
of the Population Council, the International Planned Parenthood
Federation, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, the World Bank, and
UN population control agencies. But there is no doubt that this
program involved deceptive practices, propaganda campaigns, forced
sterilization, bribery, murder, and corruption on a large scale, without actually having any research into correlations between population size and poverty or how sterilization campaigns influence population growth.

We don’t shrink from calling it the world population control
conspiracy. Welcome to the New World Order. None of these controllers
has been charged with a crime. Instead, they are elevated as heroes
and held up as philanthropists who are acting in the best interests
of the people they are victimizing. This is the level of deceit we
are dealing with.

The people who are most ignorant of the world population control
program reside in the United States, mainly because population controllers lied to Congress. If you wonder why the rest of the world resents U.S. intrusion, rest assured it is not because they envy our democracy or our wealth. It is because they know that the United States funded the evil population control programs and targeted their families.

Now refer back to the arguments for population control in Garrett Hardin’s book, The Ostrich Factor. You can now understand Hardin’s arguments as phony cover for the population control reality. Top-level population controllers don’t dirty their hands with program administration. They instead indoctrinate the dumbest people, the feminists, with phony statistics and propaganda to enlist them into becoming program administrators. You are controlled by their lies. Your destiny is to be controlled by the dumbest and most evil people on the planet, the feminists, in the name of Enviro-socialism.

The United States government, the United Nations, and the feminists are the enemies of the people of the world.

Propaganda terms to reject: global population control, economic development under free trade, food riots, right to progress, global famine, planning other people’s families, free condoms, The Limits of Growth, one-child policy, the UN Population Award, the World Food Program.